A Techno-Economic Analysis of Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) and Solar Power Tower (SPT) as Solar Energy in Malaysia


  • Nur Akmal Jailani School of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • Arshad Ahmad Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • Norafneeza Norazahar School of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Malaysia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3071-7649




Malaysia receives an annual average of 2200 hours of solar radiation, making her abundant renewable resources to generate electricity. Thus, a good planning is required to manage the resources efficiently and to utilize the abundant resources fully. Concentrating solar power (CSP) technology is a possible approach to manage renewable resources in Malaysia. Using a techno-economic analysis, the researchers, engineers, industries, or government agencies will be able to identify contributing and discouraging factors of building the CSP technology. This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of two CSP technology: parabolic trough collector (PTC) and solar power tower (SPT), for potential implementation in Malaysia. This paper provides information on two CSP technologies to researchers and industries prior to the planning and design stages. The techno-economic analysis begins with identifying potential locations based on the direct normal irradiation (DNI). Kuah, Kuantan, Miri and Labuan are identified as the potential locations using the RETScreen Expert software. Labuan could be the most promising PTC and SPT technology project because it has the highest DNI received annually. Next, the techno-economic analysis uses two reference projects, ANDASOL-1 and PS-10 systems in Spain, as references for all locations. The techno-economic analysis consists of annual electricity generation, unit cost of electricity, net Present Value (NPV), benefit-to-cost ratio (B/C), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback period calculated in Microsoft Excel. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to measure the impact of uncertainties of one or more input variables, leading to uncertainties on the output variables. Two sensitive factors are the annual electricity generation and the initial cost, affecting the construction, installation, and implementation of PTC or SPT technology.


Energy Commission. 2019. Malaysia Energy Statistics Handbook. Suruhanjaya Tenaga (Energy Commission). Retrieved from: https://meih.st.gov.my/documents/10620/bcce78a2-5d54-49ae-b0dc-549dcacf93ae. Retrieved date: May 4, 2021.

Gozgor, G., Mahalik, M. K., Demir, E., and Padhan, H. 2020. The impact of economic globalization on renewable energy in the OECD countries. Energy Policy, 139: 111365.

The International Energy Association (IEA). 2019. Global CO2 emissions in 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.iea.org/articles/global-co2-emissions-in-2019 Retrieved date: April 20, 2021.

United Nations. 2021. Goal 7. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal7. Retrieved date: May 4, 2021.

Alizadeh, R., Soltanisehat, L., Lund, P. D., and Zamanisabzi, H. 2020. Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method. Energy Policy, 137: 111174.

Mehos, M., Turchi, C., Jorgenson, J., Denholm, P., Ho, C., and Armijo, K. 2016. On the Path to SunShot - Advancing Concentrating Solar Power Technology, Performance, and Dispatchability. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Retrieved from: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/65688.pdf. Retrieved date: October 28, 2021.

Kuravi, S., Trahan, J., Goswami, D. Y., Rahman, M. M., and Stefanakos, E. K. 2013. Thermal energy storage technologies and systems for concentrating solar power plants. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 39(4): 285-319.

Islam, M. T., Huda, N., and Saidur, R. 2019. Current energy mix and techno-economic analysis of concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies in Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 140: 789–806.

Islam, M. T., Huda, N., Abdullah, A. B., and Saidur, R. 2018. A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Current status and research trends. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 91: 987-1018.

Shamsuddin, A. 2012. Development of renewable energy in Malaysia - Strategic initiatives for carbon reduction in the power generation sector. International Energy Congress 2012, 49, 384–391.

Agyekum, E.B., and Velkin, V. I. 2020. Optimization and techno-economic assessment of concentrated solar power (CSP) in South-Western Africa: A case study on Ghana. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 40, 100763.

Aly, A., Bernardos, A., Fernandez-Peruchena, C.M., Jensen, S.S., Pedersen, A.B. 2019. Is Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) a feasible option for Sub-Saharan Africa?: Investigating the techno-economic feasibility of CSP in Tanzania. Renewable Energy, 135: 1224 – 1240.

Cavallaro, F. 2009. Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies. Renewable Energy, 34(7): 1678–1685.

Purohit, I., and Purohit, P. 2010. Techno-economic evaluation of concentrating solar power generation in India. Energy Policy, 38(6): 3015-3029.

Ravelli, S., Franchini, G., and Perdichizzi, A. 2018. Comparison of different CSP technologies for combined power and cooling production. Renewable Energy, 121: 712–721.

Lipu, M. S. H, and Jamal, T. 2013. Techno-economic Analysis of Solar Concentrating Power (CSP) in Bangladesh. International Journal of Advanced Renewable Energy Research, 2(5): 750–762.

Mohammadi, K., Khanmohammadi, S., Immonen, J., and Powell, K. 2021. Techno-economic analysis and environmental benefits of solar industrial process heating based on parabolic trough collectors. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47: 101412.

Mohamad, A., Orfi, J., and Alansary, H. 2014. Heat losses from parabolic trough solar collectors. International Journal of Energy Research, 38(1): 20-28.

Fernández-García, A., Zarza, E., Valenzuela, L., and Pérez, M. 2010. Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(7): 1695–1721.

Isa, N.M., Tan, C.W., Yatim, A.H.M. 2017. A techno-economic assessment of grid connected photovoltaic system for hospital building in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 217: 012016.

Gakkhar, N. and Soni, M. S. (2014). Techno-Economic Parametric Assessment of CSP Power Generations Technologies in India. Energy Procedia, 54: 152–160.

Wang, Q., Pei, G., and Yang, H. 2021. Techno-economic assessment of performance-enhanced parabolic trough receiver in concentrated solar power plants. Renewable Energy, 167: 629–643.

Yang, S., Zhu, X., and Guo, W. 2018. Cost-Benefit Analysis for the Concentrated Solar Power in China. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 2018: 1 – 11. Doi: 10.1155/2018/4063691.

Tahir, S., Ahmad, M., Abd-ur-Rehman, H.M., and Shakir, S. 2021. Techno-economic assessment of concentrated solar thermal power generation and potential barriers in its deployment in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293: 126125.




How to Cite

Jailani, N. A., Ahmad, A., & Norazahar, N. (2021). A Techno-Economic Analysis of Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) and Solar Power Tower (SPT) as Solar Energy in Malaysia. Journal of Energy and Safety Technology (JEST), 4(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v4n2.94