COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) VALIDATION FOR ELECTRIC AND CONVENTIONAL VEHICLE FIRES IN A TUNNEL

Authors

  • Teck Wai, Alan Chan Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Thomas Shean Yaw Choong Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Zahirasri Mohd Tohir Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mus’ab Abdul Razak Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v9.225

Keywords:

Battery Electric Vehicle, Internal Combustion Engine Vehicle, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Root Mean Square Error, Fire Size, Temperature

Abstract

This study justifies the application of a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model, developed using Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), for validating and extending the analysis of experimental data from full-scale tunnel fires involving battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs). The model was rigorously calibrated using experimental heat release rate (HRR) data and demonstrated a strong capability to reproduce the where and when temperature trends observed across multiple fire scenarios. Quantitative validation through Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) analysis confirmed acceptable engineering accuracy, with contextualized percentage errors providing clear boundaries of model performance. Notably, the model performed with higher accuracy for ICEV fires (~12% error) compared to BEV fires (~20-26% error), highlighting the increased complexity of battery fire dynamics. The CFD model successfully captured critical fire dynamics, including thermal stratification and decay patterns with distance from the fire source. This work establishes that the validated CFD model serves as a reliable and cost-effective tool for supplementing physical experiments, enabling detailed analysis of fire behavior and supporting tunnel safety design where experimental data is limited. The validation is limited to gas temperature predictions in a single tunnel geometry, using experimentally measured HRR as the prescribed fire source together with simplified combustion and material models. The model does not resolve detailed species concentrations or battery degradation chemistry. The reported error ranges (approximately 11–15% for ICEVs and 20–26% for BEVs) should therefore be interpreted as engineering accuracy bounds for similar tunnel configurations, rather than as universal performance indicators.

References

Sturm P, Fößleitner P, Fruhwirt D, Galler R, Wenighofer R, Heindl SF, Krausbar S, Heger O. Fire tests with lithium-ion battery electric vehicles in road tunnels. Fire Safety Journal. 2023;134:103695.

Sturm P, Fößleitner P, Fruhwirt D, Heindl SF, Heger O, Galler R, Wenighofer R, Krausbar S. Dataset of fire tests with lithium-ion battery electric vehicles in road tunnels. Data in Brief. 2023;46:108839.

Kashef A, Saber HH. Application of CFD techniques for modelling fire tests in road tunnels. In: 5th International Conference on Tunnel Safety and Ventilation; 2010; Graz, Austria. p. 221–228. (Ville-Marie Tunnel, Tube C ventilation verification).

Woodburn P, Britter RE. CFD simulations of a tunnel fire—Part I. Fire Safety Journal. 1996;26(1):35–62. doi:10.1016/03797112(96)00018-5.

Woodburn P, Britter RE. CFD simulations of a tunnel fire—Part II. Fire Safety Journal. 1996;26(1):63–90. doi:10.1016/0379-7112(96)00019-7.

BRAFA. Fire effects of vehicles with alternative drive systems (BRAFA). Project entry, Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG); accessed 5 May 2022. Available from: https://projekte.ffg.at/projekte/3290205.

Fößleitner P, Sturm P. “BRAFA” – project, measurement data. Data repository, Graz University of Technology; 2021. doi:10.3217/ysgwn-3a318.

Vidmar P. Risk evaluation in road tunnels based on CFD results. Thermal Science. 2022;26(2B):1432–1450. doi:10.2298/TSCI201108174V.

Reszka P, Steinhaus T, Biteau H, Carvel R, Rein G, Torero JL. Study of fire durability for a road tunnel: Comparing CFD and simple analytical model. In: 4th International Conference on Tunnel Safety and Ventilation; 2008; Graz, Austria. p. 163–172.

Krishnamoorthy RR, Saleheen Z. Numerical simulation of spalling and moisture evaporation in concrete tunnel linings exposed to fire. In: Kodur V, Agrawal A, editors. Fire performance of high-strength concrete structures. Singapore: Springer; 2022. p. 801–818. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7924-7_57.

Singh R. Lightweight metals and alloys in electric vehicle manufacturing: Enhancing performance and efficiency. International Journal of Scientific Research and Applications. 2024;13(2):143–152. doi:10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2343.

Ministry of Housing and Local Government (KPKT). Planning Guidelines for Electric Vehicle Charging Bay (EVCB). 1st ed. Putrajaya (Malaysia): KPKT; 2023.

Rosenbaum ER, editor. SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection. 2nd ed. Quincy (MA): Society of Fire Protection Engineers and National Fire Protection Association; 2007.

Lecocq A, Bertana M, Truchot B, Marlair G. Comparison of the fire consequences of an electric vehicle and an internal combustion engine vehicle. In: 2nd International Conference on Fires in Vehicles (FIVE 2012); 2012; Chicago, IL, USA.

Forney GP. User’s Guide for Smokeview Version 5 – A tool for visualizing Fire Dynamics Simulation data. NIST Special Publication 1017-1. Gaithersburg (MD): National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2007. 134 p.

McGrattan K, Hostikka S, Floyd J, Baum H, Rehm R, Mell W, et al. Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5): Technical Reference Guide, Volume 1 – Mathematical model. NIST Special Publication 1018-5. Gaithersburg (MD): National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2009. 94 p.

McDermott RJ, Forney GP, McGrattan K, Mell WE. Fire Dynamics Simulator Version 6: Complex geometry, embedded meshes and quality. NIST Technical Note 1889. Gaithersburg (MD): National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2015.

McDermott RJ, Forney GP, McGrattan K, Mell WE. Fire Dynamics Simulator Version 6: Complex geometry, embedded meshes, and quality assessment. National Institute of Standards and Technology; June 2010.

Sturm, J., Oplustil, J., Fasser, M., and Biegl, J., “Fire tests with lithium-ion battery electric vehicles in road tunnels,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 125, 104528, 2022.

Kohl, A., Rattei, G., Sturm, J., and Fasser, M., “Investigation of fires with electric vehicles in underground traffic areas,” Tunnel, 2021

Sturk, D., Ekelund, M., and Blomqvist, P., “Analysis of combustion gases from large-scale electric vehicle battery fires,” Fire Safety Journal, 141, 103021, 2023.

Larsson, F., Andersson, P., and Mellander, B.-E., “A review of battery fires in electric vehicles,” RISE report, 2020.

Moser, A., “CFD simulation validation for tunnel ventilation – a case study from the Arlberg Tunnel,” University of Leoben, 2025.

Papapostolou, K. et al., “Smoke extraction in a sinusoidal floor tunnel: experimental and numerical study,” Emerging Materials and Structural Technology, c. 2022–2023.

vehicle

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

How to Cite

Chan, T. W. A., Yaw Choong, T. S., Mohd Tohir, M. Z., & Abdul Razak, M. (2026). COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) VALIDATION FOR ELECTRIC AND CONVENTIONAL VEHICLE FIRES IN A TUNNEL. Journal of Energy and Safety Technology (JEST), 9(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v9.225

Issue

Section

Articles