COMBINED EFFECTS OF WATER DEPTH, ELECTRODE SPACING, AND ADDITIONAL SUBSTRATE IN A SOIL MICROBIAL FUEL CELL FOR SUSTAINABLE BIOELECTRIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v8.203Keywords:
fossil fuel consumption; Soil Microbial Fuel Cell; bioelectricity; microorganism; voltage outputAbstract
The Soil Microbial Fuel Cell (SMFC) is a technology that utilizes the metabolic activity of soil microorganisms to produce bioelectricity. SMFC provides a sustainable and environmentally friendly energy solution that has the capacity to alleviate the negative consequences of fossil fuel consumption. Unfortunately, there are many factors such as water depth, electrode spacing and types of additional substrate used will affect the performance of a soil microbial fuel cell (SMFC). Therefore, in order to improve and enhance the efficiency of SMFC, factors that contribute to low bioelectricity production need to be studied. In this study, there were 3 different parameters that were investigated for their effect towards the performance of soil microbial fuel cell (SMFC), which were the water depth, electrode spacing and extra substrate types added. SMFC’s configuration in this study was built in a 10cm x 10 cm x 12cm PVC box, with attached stainless steel’s activated carbon felt as electrodes and rice washing water (RWW) as control substrate and with high clay content soil in fixed 10 cm soil level. The experiment was conducted for 3 months duration and multimeter was used to record the voltage output of SMFC. Total Bacteria Count (TBC) analysis was also conducted to study the relationship between number of microorganisms and voltage generation (mV). Combined effects of SMFC were observed at the end of the experiment. Throughout the study, it was found that the SMFC with 10 cm water depth, 5 cm electrode spacing and using only rice washing water (RWW) as substrate without any addition of other substrate was to be the best condition with the maximum voltage output of 711 mV. Moreover, with TBC analysis, this setup has proven that the more the number of microorganisms in the fuel cell, the higher the voltage output (mV) as it has the highest amount of microorganisms up to 141 × 10⁶ of microorganisms at its highest voltage output’s peak.
References
C. Yu, M. Moslehpour, T. K. Tran, L. M. Trung, J. P. Ou, and N. H. Tien, “Impact of non-renewable energy and natural resources on economic recovery: Empirical evidence from selected developing economies,” Resour. Policy, vol. 80, p. 103221, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103221
V. Smil, “A Global Transition to Renewable Energy Will Take Many Decades,” SCI AM. Accessed: May 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-global-transition-to-renewable-energy-will-take-many-decades/
N. Vig, K. Ravindra, and S. Mor, “Environmental impacts of Indian coal thermal power plants and associated human health risk to the nearby residential communities: A potential review,” Chemosphere, vol. 341, p. 140103, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140103.
S. Chibueze Izah, A. Omozemoje Aigberua, and A. Lal Srivastav, “Microbial fuel cells,” in Artificial Intelligence for Renewable Energy Systems, Elsevier, 2022, pp. 105–129. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90396-7.00014-6.
W. Yao, X. Han, Y. Huang, Z. Zheng, Y. Wang, and X. Wang, “Analysis of the influencing factors of the dust on the surface of photovoltaic panels and its weakening law to solar radiation — A case study of Tianjin,” Energy, vol. 256, p. 124669, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124669.
P. P. A. Amit, “A Review on Soil Based Microbial Fuel Cell,” Int. J. Sci. Techonlogy Manag., vol. 10, no. 11, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijstm.com/images/short_pdf/1637843744_J128.pdf
S. Z. Abbas, J.-Y. Wang, H. Wang, J.-X. Wang, Y.-T. Wang, and Y.-C. Yong, “Recent advances in soil microbial fuel cells based self-powered biosensor,” Chemosphere, vol. 303, p. 135036, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135036. [8] D. Vidhyeswari, A. Surendhar, and S. Bhuvaneshwari, “General aspects and novel PEMss in microbial fuel cell technology: A review,” Chemosphere, vol. 309, p. 136454, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136454.
G. G. Gagliardi et al., “Microbial fuel cells with polychlorinated biphenyls contaminated soil as electrolyte: energy performance and decontamination potential in presence of compost,” J. Power Sources, vol. 613, p. 234878, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234878.
M. Mashkour, M. Rahimnejad, M. Mashkour, and F. Soavi, “Increasing bioelectricity generation in microbial fuel cells by a high-performance cellulose-based membrane electrode assembly,” Appl. Energy, vol. 282, p. 116150, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116150.
K. S. Maan, P. Gajbhiye, A. Sharma, and A.-A. Al-Gheethi, “Efficient anode material derived from nutshells for bio-energy production in microbial fuel cell,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 364, p. 121422, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121422.
Z. Zafar, S. Naz, N. H. Malik, F. Ahmed, and N. Ali, “Bioelectrogeneic performance of air-cathode microbial fuel cells with diesel contaminants,” Fuel, vol. 355, p. 129407, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129407.
A. Nandy et al., “Influence of carbon-based cathodes on biofilm composition and electrochemical performance in soil microbial fuel cells,” Environ. Sci. Ecotechnology, vol. 16, p. 100276, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100276.
H.-U.-D. Nguyen, D.-T. Nguyen, and K. Taguchi, “A compact, membrane-less, easy-to-use soil microbial fuel cell: Generating electricity from household rice washing wastewater,” Biochem. Eng. J., vol. 179, p. 108338, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2022.108338.
Y. Sakai, C. M. Nielsen, Y. Sato, S. Kato, and Y. Kansha, “Evaluation of the Dependence of Microbial Fuel Cells on Soil Composition and Water Content,” J. Ital. Assoc. Chemcial Eng., vol. 94, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2294103.
I. M. Simeon, A. Weig, and R. Freitag, “Optimization of soil microbial fuel cell for sustainable bio-electricity production: combined effects of electrode material, electrode spacing, and substrate feeding frequency on power generation and microbial community diversity,” Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 124, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s13068-022-02224-9.
R. Bhattacharya et al., “Bioremediation and bioelectricity from Himalayan rock soil in sediment-microbial fuel cell using carbon rich substrates,” Fuel, vol. 341, p. 127019, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127019.
M. Müller-Inkmann and H.-C. Fründ, “Glucose amendment influences restructuring of compacted soil blocks – Results of a field experiment with varying soil-site conditions,” Soil Tillage Res., vol. 211, p. 105025, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105025.
