SAFETY CLIMATE AND SAFETY CULTURE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES OF UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v7.170Keywords:
Safety Culture, Safety Climate, Laboratory Safety, University, UndergraduateAbstract
Laboratory safety could pose a high risk due to the presence of hazards, physical, electrical, chemical, etc. Such conditions expose students or university staff to potential accidents in laboratories. The lack of safety climate and safety culture among university students is one of the main contributing factors to laboratory accidents. Therefore, this research aims to assess and improve the safety climate and safety culture among undergraduate students in the Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering (FCEE) at Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), specifically within the Separation Process and Fluid Mechanics laboratories. The assessment will focus mainly on individuals actively engaged in laboratory work -- safety attitude, awareness, behaviours, and perceptions. A set of questionnaires is a tool to collect data on these variables, i.e. safety attitude, awareness, behaviours, and perceptions. The questionnaire was used to collect student data to assess their safety climate and safety culture in the academic laboratory setting. The questionnaire consists of socio-demographic, safety attitude, safety awareness, safety behaviour, and safety perception sections. The data was analyzed by using Kruskal Wallis test, Mann Whitney U-test, and Spearman Correlation. The study found that significant differences in the safety culture of undergraduate chemical engineering students in academic laboratories were influenced by factors such as age, years of study, laboratory experience, and participation in safety training, while safety climate was significantly impacted by the length of time spent in the lab and participation in safety training.
References
Wu, T.C., Liu, C.W., & Lu, M.C. (2007). Safety climate in university and college laboratories: Impact of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Safety Research, 38, 91–102.
Michalovic, M. (2008). Not-so-great moments in chemical safety. Chemical Heritage News Magazine, 26(2).
García-Martínez, J., Bermejo-Barrera, P., & Moreda-Piñeiro, A. (2016). Laboratory chemicals for academic research and teaching: A technological challenge for analytical chemistry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 408(10), 2409–2416.
Skoog, D.A., Holler, F.J., & Crouch, S.R. (2013). Principles of Instrumental Analysis. Cengage Learning.
Hill, R.H. (2016). The impact of OSHA's Laboratory Standard on undergraduate safety education. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 23(5), 12–17.
Pourang, N., Esmaeili, F., & Ranjbarian, M. (2017). Assessment of potential safety hazards of three fisheries research centers' laboratories staff by failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) and the relevant statistical methods. Iran Journal of Health and Environment, 10, 87–102.
Kinderlerer, J. (2004). Risk and the law: Scientists do not necessarily like the restrictions and regulations of biotechnology, but they need to accept that lawmakers must reflect the wishes and demands of the majority of the population, who are increasingly aware of the potential risks. EMBO Reports, 5, S66–70.
Menard, A.D., & Trant, J. (2019). A review and critique of academic lab safety research. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31740762/.
Bena, A., Farina, E., Orengia, M., & Quarta, D. (2016). Promotion of safety culture in Italian schools: Effectiveness of interventions on student injuries. European Journal of Public Health, 26, 587–592.
Walters, A.U.C., Lawrence, W., & Jalsa, N.K. (2017). Chemical laboratory safety awareness, attitudes, and practices of tertiary students. Safety Science, 96, 161–171.
Wu, Q., Li, W., Li, Y., Wu, X., & Xie, H. (2019). The effects of chemical hazards on reproductive and developmental toxicity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(35), 35696–35705.
Henson, R.K. (2001). Methods, plainly speaking. Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. 34, 177–189.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). An overview of psychometric measurement. 97–146.
Hasan, M.K., & Younos, T.B. (2020). Safety culture among Bangladeshi university students: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Safety Science, 131, 104922.
Gong, Y. (2019). Safety culture among Chinese undergraduates: A survey at a university. Safety Science, 111, 17–21.
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102.
Blair, E.H., Seo, D.-C., Torabi, M.R., & Kaldahl, M.A. (2004). Safety beliefs and safe behavior among Midwestern college students. Journal of Safety Research, 35(2), 131–140. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2003.11.003.
Faller, G., Mikolajczyk, R.T., Akmatov, M.K., Meier, S., & Krämer, A. (2010). Accidents in the context of study among university students—A multicentre cross-sectional study in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 487–491.
Breslin, F.C., & Smith, P. (2006). Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(1), 27–32.
Ismail, S.N., & Ramli, A. (2023). Investigate the factors affecting safety culture in the Malaysian mining industry. Resources Policy, 85, 103930.
Alkhaledi, K.A., Bendak, S., & Dashti, F.A. (2023). Assessing safety culture in public sector organisations: A cross-national study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 94, 103425.
Samaranayake, A.I., Nishadya, S., & Jayasundara, U.K. (2022). Analyzing safety culture in Sri Lankan industrial chemical laboratories. Safety and Health at Work, 13(1), 86–92.
Thamrin, Y., Pisaniello, D., & Stewart, S. (2010). Time trends and predictive factors for safety perceptions among incoming South Australian university students. Journal of Safety Research, 41, 59–63.
Griffin, M.A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347.
Hale, A.R. (2000). Culture’s confusions. Safety Science, 34(1–3), 1–14.
Wells, G. (1997). Hazard identification and risk assessment. Rugby, Warwickshire: Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE).
Schröder, I., Huang, D.Y., Ellis, O., Gibson, J.H., & Wayne, N.L. (2016). Laboratory safety attitudes and practices: A comparison of academic, government, and industry researchers. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety, 23(1), 12–23.
Suárez-Cebador, M., Rubio-Romero, J.C., Carrillo-Castrillo, J.A., & López-Arquillos, A. (2015). A decade of occupational accidents in Andalusian (Spain) public universities. Safety Science, 80, 23–32.
Yang, K. (2013). Influencing factors on undergraduate students’ response behaviors in case of fires in dormitories. Journal of Chifeng University (Natural Science Edition), 29(8), 38–42.
Yang, X. (2019). The reason for the explosion accident in Beijing Jiaotong University: It is the teacher’s negligence that killed the students. China Youth. Retrieved from https://baijiahao.baidu.com.
Zafar, S. (2023). 5 different types of risk assessment: Step by step guidance. Retrieved from https://www.hseblog.com/types-of-risk-assessment/.
