Characterization of Sago-based Biochar as Potential Feedstock for Solid Fuel

Authors

  • Jakaria Rambli Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering/Sustainable Process Engineering Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Wan Azlina Wan Abd Karim Ghani Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering/Sustainable Process Engineering Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Amran Mohd Salleh Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering/Sustainable Process Engineering Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v1n2.16

Keywords:

Sago (Metroxylon Spp), pyrolysis, calorific value, energy

Abstract

Due to decreasing supply of fossil fuels and growing environmental concerns, the application of biomass-derived energy is gaining in importance nowadays. In this study, batch pyrolysis was used to derive biochar from Sago (Metroxylon Spp) in an electrical furnance reactor. Raw biomass was selected from different sources of Sago palm including barks, fronds and cortex and the characterization was conducted for each source individually. The range between 350 ºC and 550 ºC temperature, the materials were pyrolyzed and with constant nitrogen flow rate of 50 mL min-1. Each sample of biochar produced are evaluated through proximate analysis, ultimate analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to study its potential as solid fuel for energy production. The pH value of biochar was also calculated experimentally. The total yield following by the amount of ash, volatile matter, fixed carbon content and high heating value (calorific value) were obtained in the results of all three biochar samples. Various pyrolysis temperatures resulted in different char production yield and therefore the carbon content of the produced biochars were varied within the range of 40 to 53 wt. % which is corresponded to 35 to 40 wt. % of the carbon content in biomass samples. The pH of biochar was observed to increase from 7 to 8.3 with temperature rised from 350 ºC to 550 ºC. The results from this study can be used to establish the ideal utilization routes of biomass in production of biochar as well as the source of energy.

References

Department of Statistics Malaysia. Key Statistics of Population & Demography 2017.

Liu, Z., Quek, A., Kent Hoekman, S., & Balasubramanian, R. 2013. Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. In Fuel.

Kung, C., & Chang, M. 2015. Effect of Agricultural Feedstock to Energy Conversion Rate on Bioenergy and GHG Emissions, 5981-5995.

Xu, J., Mustafa, A. M., Lin, H., Choe, U. Y., & Sheng, K. 2018. Effect of hydrochar on anaerobic digestion of dead pig carcass after hydrothermal pretreatment. Waste Management, 78: 849-856.

Qin, L., Li, Q., Meng, A., & Zhang, Y. 2013. Pyrolysis Properties of Potential Biomass Fuels in Southwestern China, 457–464.

Kunkes, E. L., Simonetti, D. A., West, R. M., Serrano-ruiz, J. C., Gartner, C. A., & Dumesic, J. A. 2008. Catalytic Conversion of Biomass to Monofuctional Hydrocarbons and Targeted Liquid-Fuel Classes, 1381 (October): 417-422.

Liu, Y., Zhu, X., Qian, F., Zhang, S., & Chen, J. 2014. Magnetic activated carbon prepared from rice straw-derived hydrochar for triclosan removal. RSC Adv. 4(109): 63620-63626.

Nam, H., & Capareda, S. 2015. Experimental investigation of torrefaction of two agricultural wastes of different composition using RSM (response surface methodology). Energy, 91 (January): 507-516.

Novak, J. M., Lima, I., Xing, B., Gaskin, J. W., Steiner, C., Das, K. C., Schomberg, H. 2009. Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental Science, 3(383): 195-206.

Qian, K., Kumar, A., Patil, K., Bellmer, D., Wang, D., Yuan, W., & Huhnke, R. L. 2013. Effects of biomass feedstocks and gasification conditions on the physiochemical properties of char. Energies, 6(8): 3972-3986.

Lee, M.-K., Tsai, W.-T., Tsai, Y.-L., & Lin, S.-H. 2010. Pyrolysis of napier grass in an induction-heating reactor. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 88(2): 110–116.

Abnisa, F., Arami-Niya, A., Daud, W. M. A. W., & Sahu, J. N. 2013. Characterization of Bio-oil and Bio-char from Pyrolysis of Palm Oil Wastes. Bioenergy Research, 6(2): 830–840.

Liu, D., Keesing, J. K., Xing, Q., & Shi, P. 2009. World’s largest macroalgal bloom caused by expansion of seaweed aquaculture in China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(6): 888–895.

C. Lim., I. Mohammed., Y. Abakr. 2016. Novel input-output prediction approach for biomass pyrolysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136: 51-61.

B. Onorevoli., G. da Silva. Maciel., M. Machado. 2018. Characterization of feedstock and biochar from energetic tobacco seed waste pyrolysis and potential application of biochar as an adsorbent. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering.

W. Yang., H. Wang., M. Zhang. 2016. Fuel properties and combustion kinetics of hydrochar prepared by hydrothermal carbonization of bamboo. Bioresource Technology, 205: 199-204.

W. Isahak., M. Hisham., M. Yarmo. 2012. A review on bio-oil production from biomass by using pyrolysis method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8): 5910-5923.

Kim, D., Yoshikawa, K., & Park, K. Y. 2015. Characteristics of biochar obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose for renewable energy. Energies.

Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Zheng, C., Lee, D. H., Uni, V., September, V. 2006. In-Depth Investigation of Biomass Pyrolysis Based on Three Major Components: Hemicellulose, Cellulose and Lignin, (17): 388-393.

McKendry, P. 2002. Energy production from biomass (part 2): conversion technologies. Bioresource Technology, 83(1): 47–54.

Mohammed, I. Y., Abakr, Y. A., Kazi, F. K., Yusuf, S., Alshareef, I., & Chin, S. A. 2015. Pyrolysis of Napier Grass in a Fixed Bed Reactor : Effect of Operating Conditions on Product Yields and. BioResources, 10(4): 6457–6478.

Masek, O., Brownsort, P., Cross, A., & Sohi, S. 2013. Influence of production conditions on the yield and environmental stability of biochar. Fuel, 103(August 2017): 151-155.

T. Imam., S. Capareda. 2012. Characterization of bio-oil, syn-gas and bio-char from switchgrass pyrolysis at various temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 93: 170-177.

Anderson, N., Jones, J. G., Page-Dumroese, D., McCollum, D., Baker, S., Loeffler, D., & Chung, W. 2013. A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass. Energies, 6(1): 164-183.

I. Obernberger., F. Biedermann., W. Widmann., Walter Riedl., Rudolf. 1997. Concentrations of inorganic elements in biomass fuels and recovery in the different ash fractions. Biomass and Bioenergy, 12(3): 211-224.

Akowuah, J. O., Kemausuor, F., & Mitchual, S. J. 2012. Physicao-chemical characteristics and market potential of sawdust charcoal briquette. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 3(1):20.

Xiong, S., Zhang, S., Wu, Q., Guo, X., Dong, A., & Chen, C. 2014. Investigation on cotton stalk and bamboo sawdust carbonization for barbecue charcoal preparation. Bioresource Technology, 152: 86-92.

Huber, G. W., Sara, I., & Corma, A. 2006. Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass. Chem Rev., 2 (106): 4044-4098.

Nurmi, J. 2015. Heating Value and Ash Content Of Intensively. Managed Stands, 60(1): 71-82.

Conti, R., Fabbri, D., Vassura, I., & Ferroni, L. 2016. Comparison of chemical and physical indices of thermal stability of biochars from different biomass by analytical pyrolysis and thermogravimetry. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 122: 160–168.

H. Nam., S. Capareda. 2015. Experimental investigation of torrefaction of two agricultural wastes of different composition using RSM (response surface methodology). Energy, 91 (January):507-516.

Ghugare, S. B., Tiwary, S., Elangovan, V., & Tambe, S. S. 2014. Prediction of Higher Heating Value of Solid Biomass Fuels Using Artificial Intelligence Formalisms. Bioenergy Research, 7(2): 681-692.

Wakchaure, G. C., & Mani, I. 2009. Effect of binders and pressures on physical quality of some biomass briquettes. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 46(4) (October-December, 2009): 24-30.

Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O’Neill, B., Neves, E. G. 2006. Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(5): 1719.

Collins, S. R., Wellner, N., Martinez Bordonado, I., Harper, A. L., Miller, C. N. Bancroft, I., & Waldron, K. W. 2014. Variation in the chemical composition of wheat straw: the role of tissue ratio and composition. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 7(1): 121.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-25

How to Cite

Rambli, J., Wan Abd Karim Ghani, W. A., & Mohd Salleh, M. A. (2018). Characterization of Sago-based Biochar as Potential Feedstock for Solid Fuel. Journal of Energy and Safety Technology (JEST), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v1n2.16

Issue

Section

Articles