A Inherent Occupational Health Assessment for Alternative Hydrogen Synthesis Pathways
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jest.v5n2.114Keywords:
Inherent Health, Health Hazard, Research and Development, Hydrogen Synthesis, Worker’s HealthAbstract
Hydrogen is one of the most investigated topics in energy transition due to its sustainability and vast applicability. However, it has health and safety challenges like any other chemical process. Most attention focuses on this fuel production's technology and economic potential with some work related to its safety impact. This study conducts an occupational health hazard assessment on two hydrogen synthesis routes at the design research and development stage. This study compares the outcomes to find the healthiest Hydrogen production route. This research leveraged the Inherent Occupational Health Index (IOHI) as the assessment to measure the health challenges peculiar to each production route. Three different index calculation types additive, average, and worst case are used to achieve the comparison. The information used in the evaluation is available at the R&D design stage. The study shows that both synthesis routes assessed steam methane reforming and coal gasification fall under the hazardous category of the IOHI index standard. But steam methane reforming has a lower IOHI index standard value of 16 than coal gasification 17.7. Therefore, although both synthesis routes are hazardous and pose occupational health risks to workers, steam methane reforming is a better alternative for hydrogen production from a health perspective.
References
F. J. Sáez-Martínez, G. Lefebvre, J. J. Hernández, and J. H. Clark, “Drivers of sustainable cleaner production and sustainable energy options,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 138, no. Part 1, pp. 1–7, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.094.
S. Bilgen, “Structure and environmental impact of global energy consumption,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 38, pp. 890–902, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.004.
A. X. Y. Mah et al., “Review of hydrogen economy in Malaysia and its way forward,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 5661–5675, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.077.
H. Council, “Study {{How Hydrogen Empowers}} the {{Energy Transition}},” 2017.
D. P. van Vuuren, P. A. Boot, J. Ros, A. F. Hof, and M. G. den Elzen, “The Implications of the Paris Climate Agreement for the Dutch Climate Policy Objectives,” no. October, pp. 1–29, 2017.
C. Acar and I. Dincer, “Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 218, pp. 835–849, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.046.
M. H. Hassim and M. Hurme, “Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 127–138, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.06.009.
W. Ying So, M. H. Hassim, S. I. Ahmad, and R. Rashid, “Inherent occupational health assessment index for research and development stage of process design,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 147, pp. 103–114, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.09.015.
R. Raslan, M. H. Hassim, N. G. Chemmangattuvalappil, D. K. S. Ng, and J. Y. Ten, “Development of inherent safety and health index for formulated product design,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 66, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104209.
L. Bobrova et al., “Water-Gas shift reaction over Ni/CeO2 catalysts,” Catalysts, vol. 7, no. 10, 2017, doi: 10.3390/catal7100310.
M. Sinaei Nobandegani, M. R. Sardashti Birjandi, T. Darbandi, M. M. Khalilipour, F. Shahraki, and D. Mohebbi-Kalhori, “An industrial Steam Methane Reformer optimization using response surface methodology,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 36, pp. 540–549, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.10.031.
“Mineral Products Industry 11.16-1,” vol. 93, pp. 1–9, 1979.
G. J. Stiegel and M. Ramezan, “Hydrogen from coal gasification: An economical pathway to a sustainable energy future,” International Journal of Coal Geology, vol. 65, no. 3–4, pp. 173–190, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2005.05.002.
P. Basu, Design of Biomass Gasifiers, First Edit. © 2010 Elsevier Inc., 2010. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374988-8.00006-4.
R. Steinberger-Wilckens et al., “THE ROLE OF HYDROGEN AND FUEL CELLS IN DELIVERING ENERGY SECURITY FOR THE UK A H2FC SUPERGEN WHITE PAPER Extended summary,” no. March, 2017.
C. R. I. Ia and E. In, “Coal Gasification Plants,” 1798.
